News

“It is not contrary to reason,” wrote David Hume, the 18th century Scottish philosopher, “for me to chuse my total ruin, to prevent the least uneasiness of an Indian or person wholly unknown to me.” The US, the UK, the EU and Nato have all said they will not directly intervene militarily to prevent the “uneasiness” of even some hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians (“Investigators start to gather evidence of possible atrocities against civilians”, Report, April 5).

But is there a threshold number for those suffering horrendous deaths — 5mn, 10mn or 20mn — which, if reached, leads the west to intervene, be it through reason, compassion or perceived self-interest?

And if that happens, what have we to say to those who were allowed to suffer and die before that threshold was reached?

Peter Cave
London W1, UK

Articles You May Like

Earthquake Death Toll Passes 2,000 in Burma; Trump’s USAID Cuts Slow Rescue Effort
Trump poised to unveil more tariffs on ‘Liberation Day’ — here’s what to expect
FTC Commissioner working remotely from Utah — despite Trump's RTO order and DOGE clampdown: sources
Rich kids flock to music festival with bottle service that costs as much as a house
Difference in retirement plans to get the best out of your golden years