News

In using a subheading “Rising star Dvornikov tasked to repeat Syria success in south-eastern assault” on the story about Alexander Dvornikov, Russia’s new commander, surely your editors were on autopilot, under the sway of some malign robotic influence?

For no one but a monster or the lackey of a tyrant could present anything to do with the ongoing Syrian civil war as a “success”. In the article there is talk of military superiority, an objective measure. But where did this use of “success” come from?

Henry Wessells
Upper Montclair, NJ, US

Articles You May Like

Mexico and Canada retaliate against US in-kind after Trump hits them with tariffs
Female driver killed, passenger injured as Tesla flips and bursts into flames on NYC’s FDR Drive
How Obama, Biden crackdowns spurred debanking fiasco
Bitcoin Cash’s Mt. Gox-Led Sell-Off Is Amplified by Poor Liquidity
Fate of Medicaid Uncertain During Trump’s Freeze on Federal Grants