News

“It is not contrary to reason,” wrote David Hume, the 18th century Scottish philosopher, “for me to chuse my total ruin, to prevent the least uneasiness of an Indian or person wholly unknown to me.” The US, the UK, the EU and Nato have all said they will not directly intervene militarily to prevent the “uneasiness” of even some hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians (“Investigators start to gather evidence of possible atrocities against civilians”, Report, April 5).

But is there a threshold number for those suffering horrendous deaths — 5mn, 10mn or 20mn — which, if reached, leads the west to intervene, be it through reason, compassion or perceived self-interest?

And if that happens, what have we to say to those who were allowed to suffer and die before that threshold was reached?

Peter Cave
London W1, UK

Articles You May Like

Snapchat's Early Investor General Catalyst Plans To Raise $6B For Tech Startups In US, Europe And India Despite Funding Drought
EXO Closes Chattanooga Office to Focus on Managed Transportation Tech
EXCLUSIVE: Janover’s Fintech Platform Clocks 766% Growth in Lender Sign-Ups in 2023
AppTech CTO Says AI Can Be Used To ‘Detect Unusual Activities,’ Flag Fraud
AppTech CTO Says AI Can Be Used To ‘Detect Unusual Activities,’ Flag Fraud